Skip to main content

Day 2: Engineering Design Process

KNEX Project:

Team members:
  • Katie
  • Hailey
  • Anjani
Team Plan and the Engineering Design Process:

Our plan was separated into an 8 step process, otherwise known as the Engineering Design Process

Step 1: Define the problem
 
    Our goal today was creating a mode of transportation. We could choose what we were transporting and how it would be moved; In our case, we decided to move a penny Anjani had in her pencil bag.

Step 2: Research the problem 

    In this particular scenario we were constrained with a small bag of KNEX pieces. None of us had experience with these parts, so we began to familiarize ourselves with the mechanics of the pieces.

Step 3 + 4: Brainstorm

    We ultimately decided on a car rather quickly, but we were not completely sure of the ways we could create a car. Through fumbling with the pieces a little bit and researching pictures of KNEX cars other people had made online, we came up with a final plan which leads us to Step 5.

Step 5: Create

    We had Hailey draw out our plan while we decided on our essential features (a seat for our coin, and a base with four wheels). We now officially had a collective vision and idea of what we were creating.

Step 6: Test

    In our initial build, although we had a moving car, we found that the axes we used to connect our sets wheels were too short, so we were unsuccessful in implementing our "seat" for our coin. 

Step 7 + 8: Improve and Redesign

    We sat with our original build for a minute and reassessed our available KNEX pieces, in which we found a longer stick! We redrew a new sketch that included a wider 4 wheel base so our seat could effectively fit.

Pictured: First Design Sketch vs Updated Design Sketch



Step 8: Retest

    This is where we officially tested out our build with the class' TA. While we now had a working car AND a working seat, we unfortunately failed to recognize a coin seatbelt as an essential feature; During our trial, our coin flew off our build when going at a fast enough speed, so in the future we concluded that we would test our prototype in multiple conditions (different speeds, obstacles, etc). 
  
Pictured: Our TA-Tested Design





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

QR Code

  QR Code to Katie's Blog

Day 7: Are Animals People?

If you do not meet all the criteria for personhood, does that mean you are not a person?   A person could be capable of a certain criteria more than another criteria and still be a person. If a person lacks a certain criteria like morality, they could still be highly sentient or highly reasonable. I think 'matching the criteria' is a spectrum. For example, a being that we consider would normally consider capable of personhood (such as a human) can be born uncapable or weaker in a certain criteria, but that does not inherently make them not a person. The idea of these criteria is a blanket term, and the term 'personhood' itself is broad and nonrestrictive. 

Day 11: Dr. Schuman

  Guest Speaker: Dr. Schuman Today we got firsthand experience in creating data for a machine learning activity. We visited a site where we were able to feed information through series of pictures of either a facial expression, a hand signal, or certain objects. With this information, our machine was able to learn what traits were associated with certain items through an accumulation of mathematical formulas. Additionally we also got to play with an app that learned from other people's drawings and was able to complete our drawings and portray certain prompts (such as dog, cat, mermaid, lighthouse etc).  Overall it was an engaging experience that allowed us to learn about machine learning data and experience collecting data ourselves.  Pictured: Training Data of My Classmate